Artificial Intelligent Robots to Work Along Humans as Assistants

Human scientists are looking for ways to build smarter and better Artificial Intelligent Robots to work along their human counterparts as assistants to increase efficiency and task performance. Like R2D2 and C3PO in George Lucas’ famous Star Wars Blockbuster movie. Super smart think tank teams believe that they are on the verge of figuring it all out.

You see if we want Artificial Intelligent (AI) robotic assistants to interface and work along side humans, then we need to give them personality. You see we cannot use only mirroring, that is only a component of life. Mirroring is a common human trait and it is something that Carnegie Mellon has been doing for some time and we also see this with Japanese Robotic Researchers and even those top dogs at MIT. But mirroring alone is not enough, as it gets to the point of aggravation fairly quickly.

We cannot allow the human-computer bonding to be only sustaining such patterns of mirroring, we need to weave into the process, some anomalies which are found in human interaction for the bonding to be sufficient, as the human innate tendency is to mirror the robot too. Let me discuss with you an abstract though along this line of reasoning. You see if every person were the same it would be like the Borg, if every one owned the exact same car folks would not appreciate their cars and if every tree were the same it would be like a fake forest not a real one.

So when we make a replica tree, it cannot ever be an exact replica of any tree ever made, but rather within a realm or two parallel lines or borders of adaptations and each individual tree must be within in those borders and the dots representing the trees must meander within those lines, touching the lines, jotting back and forth or even crossing them. You see that is life. Something that can go outside the boundaries not confined.

The most brilliant minds believe that they can design robotic assistants, which humans will bond too and believe they can figure this out. They are betting on it. By using such an individualistic approach to personalities in AI Robotics; then and only then will the mind see what it really expects, not just a dumb hunk of metal robot. Not a computer game with boundaries, but enough that there appears to be no out of bounds. Then it will more simulate and replicate life without replicable patterns in their entirety.

If not we will give away our simulation or replica, by causing within the mind a brain wave, which causes concern and says. What? It is at that instance we lose. It will be that instance that the friendship or bond between robotic assistants and humans will be broken and mistrust will ensue.

Think tankers think they can beat that and once it is figured out the applications are truly endless. Humans may come to enjoy actually being around replicas, simulations or things other than life, without cause for alarm or damage to their psyche. Many are quite sure of it. Some researchers right now think they know the answer and they have been working on it. Many of the most brilliant human minds think they will develop a perfect system of non-perfect-ness to please humans without being bothersome and thus can make a tree or many trees, which will be cut from the same mold with minor and major anomalies just like life. The systems being used are cute and the mirroring is nice and all that. Without taking anything away from their excellent work, we must admit in the here and now that these characteristics simply are not good enough yet. I seriously hope you have enjoyed our discussion today on Lance Winslow’s iPod Casting; always giving you something to think about. More on this in 2006.

Lance Winslow

Tags: , , , , , ,

No Comments »

Business Decision Matrix Artificial Intelligent Software Skepticism

Academic scientists are busy designing business decision software for companies. These Decision Matrix Artificial Intelligent Software Systems maybe used in the boardroom to help them work through strategic business scenarios. They may replace middle managers soon. These artificial programs are already being used in inbound CRM and inbound telemarketing divisions, Finite Capacity Scheduling in manufacturing and even transportation routing which means they are replacing human workers such as operators, controllers, dispatchers and soon executives.

Yet there is obviously skepticism amongst humans that they will be able to do much more. Unions are already upset with robotics doing their former jobs in manufacturing. Companies are strapped for quality labor and health care costs are rising as the average intelligence level is dropping significantly; the dummying down effect. Executives do not wish to lose their jobs too and they are in control, but if artificial intelligence can make better decisions and thus help the company profit more appeasing shareholders with quarterly profits and increased stock equity, then the executives will also need to step aside you see?

At first there will be skepticism and change often comes with fear, but that fear will pass you will see. Business decision matrix Artificial Intelligent (AI) software will soon be available for large, medium and small businesses and be capable of making decisions on nearly any situation. Think on this.

Lance Winslow

Tags: , , , , , ,

No Comments »

Articulating Boundaries of Behavioral Interaction with Artificial Intelligent Systems

If artificial intelligent robotic androids are to work along side humans and become accepted into the normality of the home as household companions and work on assigned tasks in the home they will need to be capable of a wide range of human interaction. Likewise if artificially intelligent robotic systems are to become assistants in business, military and in space for NASA, they will be working around humans and need boundaries of personality which mimic those of humans, without the occasional out bursts and antagonistic behavior humans so often exhibit which indeed end up sabotaging personal relationships unnecessarily.

I propose that we use a an articulating or ever changing set of personality boundaries of behavioral interaction with the Artificial Intelligent Robotic Android Systems that we design and program. How so you ask? Well, sometimes humans will say the wrong thing and slightly upset another human, so perhaps the robotic artificial intelligent system would stop just short of pissing off the human, but come right to the edge. Other times it might be sweet as all get out. Other times it may be agitated its self or act upset at something a human said to it. Articulating boundaries of behavior let’s call it. It makes perfect sense and would be more human like and thus more easily accepted by the humans around it? Consider this in 2006.

Lance Winslow

Tags: , , , , , , , ,

No Comments »

Close
E-mail It